|
|
|
<div class="quote"><b>以下是引用<i>Ev33</i>在2006-8-11 19:14:00的发言：</b><br/><p><font face="细明体" size="3">奇文共赏分析。有疑问的地方天云和真爱WE的玩家都在研究253，挑出毛病就是研究的一部分。所谓存在就一定合理，<strong>既然在JP流行的253就必然有它的独到之处,这就是最好的证明</strong>。与其在这里袖手旁观冷嘲热讽，说些看起来貌似冠冕堂皇的话，<font color="#ff3300"><strong>不如套用你自己的话：拿出你自己的证明来，给我不接受253的理由！</strong></font></font></p><br/></div><p></p><p>I kept silent for days 'cos I felt the discussion away from the point. </p><p>However, I may list some preliminary points for a formation against the two above.</p><p>For 2CB plus 2WB, rather more stable in my opinion, it seems terrible for some guys as they focous on the weakness of the sides.</p><p>For 2SB plus 2SMF, rather less stable, it appears more stable as it strengthens two sides. And it makes its DMFs duty of central defence.</p><p>Both above ,thanks to the triple forwards, it gives much pressure to the other team, provided the other one is fond of quick counter attack, which is the very trap prepared for them.</p><p>Easily, formations like 451 or 433 (one forward with two second tops) will fit, only if you are used to take a glance at the tiny map and know when to start the off-side trap strategy (Well, hops it not difficult 4 you, ^_^). Another key point is that you may switch your backline & off-side trap (automatic) both to A grade in the formation settings. At last, keep in mind that try your best to keep the ball. The more you act like that, the more weak points of the 253 formation awaits you.</p> |
|
楼主
发表于 2006-8-17 21:36
