This list is not attempting to name the best twenty sides of the decade, rather, on a site focussed upon tactics, it is attempting to outline the twenty most interesting sides in terms of the way they played, or in the way the team was set out on the pitch.
There are, broadly, three types of teams that feature on this list:
1. Teams who used unusual formations. They may or may not have been successful, but they experimented with an unusual shape that made them interesting to study from a tactical point of view.
2. Teams who achieved more than was expected. This is generally achieved by teams playing systems that maximise their strengths and minimise their weaknesses, and therefore can be held up as an example of how to successfully employ tactics in football.
3. Teams who were consistently successful. One-off success can often be attributed to a fortunate set of circumstances or a few key players performing at the top of their game, but sides who are consistently successful generally do so because of a thoughtful, creative and positive strategy.
Everything here is up for debate. The list – of course – but also the success (or lack of) of each team, the reasons for their performance, and even the formation of each side.
管你打败谁，就是不选你
咳咳~
http://sg.2chy.com/attchments/201005/14/563_1273826332xeYb.gif
只能说写这文章的作者是个皇马黑,仅此而已
回复 8# 马特拉奇
膜拜英文达人，小弟自叹不如。
自相矛盾，第一点说“they may or may not have been successful”，第三点又说“Teams who were consistently successful. ”
前十年就这么多了。。。
经典贴。
按照这个来说 还是希腊最牛逼 要不给模拟鸟的波尔图
09/10 INTER MILAN
这些人真厉害啊，足球和英语都这么懂
曼联06？ 扯淡吧07-09才靠谱 埃弗拉和维迪奇才是21世纪的曼联救世主。。。不解释
曼联潮人 发表于 2010-5-14 16:18 http://bbs.winning11cn.com/images/common/back.gif
06到09说是其实就是三冠那三个赛季
居然有我厂
2004希腊毫无悬念- -
没有两支世界杯得主？